That’s a No-No

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. | Apr 24, 2025 | Admin, Hospice, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Regulatory

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

No-no # 1

“No-No” may seem like something you would say to a toddler, but there is a list of things agency owners do that they should not do. Many of these are things providers may not often consider. This article focuses on the use of private duty services by hospice and home health patients, and what hospices and home health agencies cannot do with regard to aide services.

Aide Services

Both home health and hospice services are usually intermittent and provided in patients’ homes. Patients and their families may elect to utilize the services of private duty/home care companies for additional assistance. At the same time, hospice and home health patients may receive aide services from hospices and home health agencies.

Conditions of Participation

According to Medicare Conditions of Participation (CoPs), hospice and home health aides can only provide personal care services, including bathing. Aides provided by private duty/home care companies may also provide personal care. Unlike aides provided by hospices and home health agencies, however, they can provide additional services; such as laundry, food preparation, light housekeeping, shopping, and running errands.

Private Duty Services

When patients use private duty services, they are often paying for these services out of their own pockets. Even if they have long-term care insurance, patients still bear the financial burden of paying for private duty services. Longterm care insurance often costs thousands of dollars that patients probably paid for themselves. Patients usually pay by the hour for these services.

That's a No-No

Patients may, of course, utilize private duty/home care services to perform any of the services described above. It seems, however, that hospices routinely tell patients who have private duty/home care that they will not provide aide services because private duty/home care aides are able to provide personal care for patients.

Breaking it Down

Here is an example: A hospice admitted a bedridden patient with urinary and fecal incontinence. The patient and caregiver requested aide services from the hospice five days a week to bathe him. He paid for a few hours of private duty/home care services each day. The hospice refused to provide aide services five days a week to bathe him because he had private duty/home care services. No-no!

Compelled to Provide Care

ospices must provide aide services consistent with patients’ needs related to their terminal illnesses. In the example above, the patient clearly had a need for aide services five days a week. If patients and their caregivers state that they prefer to use private caregivers for personal care, then hospices must document the refusal of hospice aide services offered, consistent with applicable standards of care. Then hospices are not required to provide aide services.

Profiteering

When hospices deny aide services that are consistent with applicable standards of care and require patients and caregivers to use private duty/home care services, hospices are shifting the cost of aide services onto patients and their families. Patients and their families may have to pay for additional private duty/home care services to meet patients’ needs. The result for hospices is that they do not incur the costs of aide services, thereby increasing their profits at the expense of patients and their families.

If hospice staff members who refuse to provide aide services to patients and require patients and their families to use private duty/home care services instead are compensated in any way based on the financial performance or profitability of the hospices, let’s hope they look good in orange jumpsuits!

Intent to Defraud

If the private duty/home care services are being paid for by any federal or state health care program; such as Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, VA, or TriCare; then both home health agencies and hospices have engaged in fraudulent conduct by shifting costs that they should have incurred onto other federal government programs.

God forbid that the hospice also owns the company from which patients receive private duty/home care services! Then hospices are limiting their costs while profiting from patients and their families.

Dig Deep and Find Your No-No's

Now is the time for all home health agencies and hospices especially to audit patients’ records to make certain that all patients have been offered services that they are required to provide. If patients and their families choose to use private duty/home care aides instead, documentation must show that they were offered the services but chose to use private duty/home care aides.

No-No's Final Thoughts

The bottom line is that hospices and home health agencies must always provide services needed by patients. Patients may choose to pay for services that are paid for by the Medicare hospice or home health benefits. Patients cannot be required to pay for services privately that hospices and home health agencies must provide. Unacceptable!

This article is the first in a series of “No-no” items for agency owners.

# # #

Elizabeth Hogue is an attorney in private practice with extensive experience in health care. She represents clients across the U.S., including professional associations, managed care providers, hospitals, long-term care facilities, home health agencies, durable medical equipment companies, and hospices.

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

©2025 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Ensuring HIPAA Compliance in Healthcare Communication

by Rowan Report | Mar 31, 2025 | Admin, Clinical, HIPAA

by Devin Paullin, CGO at Skyscape Buzz

Ensuring HIPAA Compliance

Communications Requiring HIPAA Compliance

While patient communication requires HIPAA adherence, so does any discussion between other parties. Essentially, any time PHI is discussed, a degree of confidentiality must be involved. For example, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requires that sensitive patient data be protected when shared or discussed among:

Healthcare Providers and Patients
- Any time a caregiver, staff member, doctor, nurse, or any other employee communicates with a patient, resident, or client, outside of face-to-face meetings, it must be done securely in a way that meets HIPAA standards.
Healthcare Professionals Among Themselves
- HIPAA compliance must be met when healthcare professionals discuss PHI within their department or collaborate with external departments.
Healthcare Providers and Insurance Companies
- Insurance providers require patient details and sensitive PHI. Still, anything that makes information vulnerable to interception must be fully compliant with HIPAA standards.
Healthcare Organizations and Third-Party Associates
- Third parties that need to handle PHI (e.g., IT consultants, collections agencies, or other vendors) must do so in a way that protects patient data. To safeguard communication, healthcare organizations should ask outside associates, vendors, or agencies to sign a business associate agreement (BAA) and/or Data Processing Agreement (DPA). This is a formal agreement to comply with HIPAA standards and ensure accountability.
Healthcare Organizations and Public Health Authorities
- Some diseases or conditions require healthcare professionals to report to public health authorities (e.g. COVID-19 information during the pandemic). This communication requires stringent security measures and protection of PHI.

Why HIPAA Compliance Matters

In healthcare, effective communication is essential for providing high-quality care. However, without HIPAA compliance, the risk of data breaches increases. Implementing secure, HIPAA-compliant communication systems ensures the protection of Personal Health Information (PHI) while improving overall operational efficiency.

Key Benefits of HIPAA-Compliant Communication

Protects Patient Privacy and Data Security
- HIPAA-compliant platforms use advanced encryption and access controls to prevent unauthorized access. This protects patient information, including medical histories, diagnoses, and test results.
Enhances Communication Efficiency
- Secure messaging platforms streamline communication between patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. These tools eliminate inefficient methods like phone calls and ensure real-time communication.
Strengthens Collaborative Care
- Providing high-quality healthcare often involves a team of professionals working together. Whether it is a hospital placing a patient in rehabilitation or home care, coordinating with intake team, care team and providers,collaboration is key. HIPAA-compliant communication tools allow these professionals to securely share critical patient information, ensuring everyone has the details they need to deliver cohesive, well-informed care.
Reduces Legal and Financial Risks
- Compliance with HIPAA regulations minimizes the risk of violations, protecting organizations from hefty fines and legal repercussions.
Maintains Patient Trust
- Patients are more likely to engage openly with healthcare providers when they feel confident that their sensitive information is protected.

How to Ensure HIPAA Compliance in Communication

To comply with HIPAA regulations, healthcare organizations should adopt the following secure communication methods:

Encrypted Emails
- Ensure emails containing PHI are encrypted and, in some cases, require patient consent.
Secure Messaging Platforms
- Use platforms specifically designed for HIPAA compliance for text-based communication.
HIPAA-Compliant Voice Calls and Telehealth
- Ensure voice and video communication channels are encrypted and secure.
Patient Portals
- Provide secure portals with two-factor authentication for patients to access their medical information.
Secure File Sharing
- Use encrypted systems for sharing patient documents and medical records.

Implementing HIPAA-Compliant Communication Platforms

Adopting a HIPAA-compliant communication platform requires a thorough evaluation of existing systems and policies. Organizations should consider the following steps:

Conduct a Communication Audit
- Identify all channels currently used for healthcare communication and assess their compliance.
Choose a Secure Platform
- Select an all-in-one communication solution designed to meet HIPAA standards.
Establish Access Controls
- Implement role-based access to ensure only authorized personnel can view PHI.
Provide Staff Training
- Educate employees on the importance of HIPAA compliance and how to use secure communication tools.
Monitor and Evaluate
- Regularly assess communication practices to identify and address vulnerabilities.

Final Thoughts

HIPAA-compliant communication is not just a legal obligation—it’s a commitment to patient privacy, security, and high-quality care. By implementing secure communication platforms, healthcare organizations can enhance efficiency, foster trust, and reduce the risk of data breaches. Investing in compliance is an investment in the long-term success and reputation of your organization.

# # #

Devin Paullin HIPAA Compliance in Home Healthcare

Devin Paullin is an award-winning innovator and executive in Healthcare Technology, having developed successful products, solutions, and partnerships in Life Sciences, Post-Acute Care, SDOH, and Long-Term industries.

He is currently Chief Growth Officer for Skyscape which provides Buzz, an all-in-one, real-time HIPAA-compliant clinical collaboration and communication platform that enables the entire staff (admins, operations, clinicians, caregivers, partners, patients, and families) with the tools to communicate securely, easily, in groups or one to one, and affordable, by any mode they choose. Visit Buzz or contact them to learn more about Buzz by Skyscape today.

©2024 by The Rowan Report, Peoria, AZ. All rights reserved. This article originally appeared in Healthcare at Home: The Rowan Report. One copy may be printed for personal use: further reproduction by permission only. editor@therowanreport.com

Alliance Statement on Congressional Budget

by Rowan Report | Mar 21, 2025 | Advocacy, CMS, Partner News, Regulatory

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Tom Threlkeld
202-547-7424
Email

Elyssa Katz
571-281-0220
Email

The Alliance Comments on Recent Congressional Budget and Reconciliation Activity

ALEXANDRIA, VA and WASHINGTON, DC, March 5, 2025 – The National Alliance for Care at Home (the Alliance) released the following statement regarding recent legislative developments that may impact the Medicaid program. These include the passage of the House Budget Bill and the reconciliation framework that includes instructions for the House Energy and Commerce Committee to find $880 billion in reductions to programs under its jurisdiction; passage of the Senate Budget framework that does not include such drastic reductions; and comments by Speaker of the House Johnson (R-LA) that any changes to Medicaid will not include caps on federal funding or changes to the state matching formulas.

“The Alliance is reassured by affirmations that the congressional majority will not pursue some of the most drastic proposals previously discussed as options for reducing federal expenditures. Our members will not support any policies that reduce access to essential home and community-based services for eligible individuals. As Congress continues to assess options to reduce federal spending, we encourage leaders to continue to look favorably on high-value services that reduce costs and improve participant satisfaction.

“Care in the home is a proven model that reduces costs and is preferred by patients and families. An independent evaluation of Money Follows the Person, a grant program that transitioned individuals from institutional settings to the community, found that total spending on older adults decreased by 20 percent during the first year and 27 percent during the second year following their move to the community.[1] If Congress wishes to seek opportunities to reduce spending, we recommend they advance care models that provide cost-effective care without limiting access to services.

“We also recognize that there are opportunities to strengthen program integrity and reduce instances of fraud, waste, and abuse in the health care sector. The Alliance supports actions that reduce fraud, waste, and abuse from bad actors without placing unnecessary burdens or unfairly punishing providers and beneficiaries who are acting in good faith. We look forward to working with Congress to advance policies that strengthen federal health care program oversight.

“Medicaid is a complex program and changes to one part of the statute may have unanticipated negative outcomes on other aspects of services, financing, or reimbursements. We encourage Congress to be extremely careful to avoid making changes that could lead to unintended outcomes. We stand ready to provide our expertise to help strengthen Medicaid for all individuals and providers.”

# # #

About the National Alliance for Care at Home

The National Alliance for Care at Home (the Alliance) is a new national organization representing providers of home care, home health, hospice, palliative care, and other health care services mainly delivered in the home. The Alliance brings together two organizations with nearly 90 years of combined experience: NAHC and NHPCO. NAHC and NHPCO have combined operations to better serve members and lead into the future of care offered in the home. Learn more at www.AllianceForCareAtHome.org.   

[1] https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/long-term-services-supports/downloads/mfpfieldreport21.pdf

More Violence in Care at Home

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq. | Mar 21, 2025 | Admin, Caregiver Safety, Caring for the Caregiver, Clinical

by Elizabeth E. Hogue, Esq.

Violence Against Home Care Providers Continues

Violence in Care at Home Continues…

Sadly, but not surprisingly, the violence against field staff caring for patients in their homes continues. Here’s a recent example:

On February 28, 2025, a hospice nurse in Texas was accosted inside a patient’s home while she was attempting to provide care. The man who accosted her inside the home followed her outside with a rifle and fired at her as she fled. The nurse was uninjured, but her car was struck by at least one bullet.

Then, still armed, the man went back inside the patient’s home where he stayed close to the patient while pointing his rifle at deputies. Law enforcement officers were able to communicate with him and de-escalate the tense situation. The man was booked into the county jail on a charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and bond was set at $250,000.

By the Numbers

According to a recent analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, healthcare is one of the most dangerous places to work. Homecare field staff members who provide services on behalf of private duty agencies, hospices, Medicare-certified home health agencies, and home medical equipment (HME) companies may be especially vulnerable. Contributing to their vulnerability is the fact that they work alone on territory that may be unfamiliar and over which they have little control. Staff members certainly need as much protection as possible.

Violence Policies Needed

First, regardless of practice setting, management should develop a written policy of zero tolerance for all incidents of violence, regardless of source. This policy should include animals. The policy must require employees and contractors to report and document all incidents of threatened or actual violence, no matter how minor.

Beyond Reporting

Emphasis should be placed on both reporting and documenting. Employees must provide as much detail as possible. The policy should also include zero tolerance for visible weapons. Caregivers must be required to report the presence of visible weapons.

UCHealth SAFE Program

Below are some additional important actions for healthcare organizations to take that are based on the UCHealth SAFE Program:

Encourage staff members to STOP if they feel unsafe for any reason.
If danger is not imminent, workers should pause to generally ASSESS their environments. Staff members should think about what happened and observe what is currently happening. Is there, for example, mounting frustration or anger?
Staff should then FAMILIARIZE themselves with the area. Who is the patient? Where is the patient? Are there any factors that might escalate behaviors? Staff members should also consider putting themselves in positions where they have a route to escape, if necessary.
ENLIST help. Getting help may, for example, include pushing panic buttons on mobile devices.

In Their Own Words

Here is what Chris Powell, Chief of Security at UCHealth, said in Becker’s Hospital Review on June 4, 2024:

“You can’t just talk about the shrimp and give you a good picture. We have to talk about the roux and the rice and everything else that goes into this for a good picture to be painted so people have an understanding. We want to solve this with an electronic learning or a 15-minute huddle, but we can’t. This is continuous and a persistent pursuit toward educating, communicating, recognizing, responding to, reporting and recovering from workplace violence.”

Chris Powell

Chief of Security, UCHealth

Final Thoughts

Every caregiver matters. The healthcare industry has lost caregivers to violence on the job in the past. Let’s do all that we can to avoid similar events in the future.

# # #

No portion of this material may be reproduced in any form without the advance written permission of the author.

HIPAA Compliance in Communication

by Rowan Report | Mar 21, 2025 | Clinical, HIPAA, Regulatory

by Devin Paulin, Skyscape

The Critical Importance of HIPAA Compliance in Home Healthcare Communication

The Rise of Messaging Apps and Healthcare Communication

Nearly 44% of the global population (3.5 billion people) rely on messaging apps to communicate. Unfortunately, available consumer SMS, text, and even “secure” messaging apps like WhatsApp, Apple Message, or Google Messages do not come with safety and security features specifically required to be compliant in the healthcare industry.

Still, consumer SMS apps are quite often used for healthcare communication in which Personal Health Information (PHI) is shared, and many individuals don’t understand the level of risk or that this is a violation of the law.

HIPAA Compliance in Communication Advantages

Group and Individual texting are a proven, timesaving, real-time communication tool in healthcare, and must be done through a HIPAA-compliant messaging platform. Secure platforms can improve privacy and security while maintaining compliance in such a sensitive industry.

There are many reasons why HIPAA compliance is vital for secure communication in home healthcare.

HIPAA Compliance in Communication - Not Just for Doctors and Nurses

HIPAA compliance is not just for medical clinics and hospitals. HIPAA compliance extends to all types of services that hold healthcare information. Physical Therapy, Personal Care, Home Health, Wellness, Behavioral Health, Assisted Living, and many more all fall under HIPAA. Most importantly, ALL providers, staff members (full or part-time), contractors, and third-party partners who come in contact with PHI are subject to HIPAA law, violations, and fines.

We're too Small for Violations to be Noticed, Though

Wrong. We regularly speak to many owners and staff members of large and small Home Health Care, Assisted Living, Hospice and Palliative, Mobile Imaging, PT and Rehabilitation, and Behavioral Health across the country. Many openly operate under the false assumption that their business is too small to be noticed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), who is responsible for enforcing the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules. That is not how it works.

Complaints logged by those within or close to your business alert the OCR to possible HIPAA violations. These can be from current and former staff, patients, clients, business partners, or anyone who claims to have witnessed a HIPAA breach. This can include disgruntled employees and whistleblowers. Even for companies that are HIPAA compliant, any breach is to be reported by an employee assigned as the security officer.

HIPAA Compliance in Home Healthcare by Type

HIPAA mandates compliance for all communications involving PHI. Some key examples include:

Provider-to-Patient Communication
- Secure platforms are necessary when caregivers contact patients outside of in-person visits.
Provider-to-Provider Communication
- Sharing PHI within or between departments must meet HIPAA standards.
Provider-to-Insurance Communication
- Insurance companies require sensitive patient data, which must be securely transmitted.
Provider-to-Third-Party Communication
- Any third-party associates handling PHI must have a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) and adhere to HIPAA regulations.
Provider-to-Public Health Authorities
- Reporting communicable diseases or pandemics requires secure communication.

Consequence of HIPAA Violations

HIPAA violations can have severe consequences, including:

Financial Penalties
- Fines range from $100 to $50,000 per violation, depending on the level of negligence.
Reputational Damage
- Data breaches erode patient trust, leading to a damaged reputation.
Legal Consequences
- In cases of willful neglect, organizations may face lawsuits or criminal charges.

Final Thoughts

Understanding and adhering to HIPAA regulations is crucial in home healthcare. Compliance not only safeguards sensitive information but also strengthens patient trust and ensures ethical operations.

# # #

Alliance Member Testifies Before Congress

by Rowan Report | Mar 13, 2025 | Advocacy, Outcomes, Partner News, Regulatory

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Elyssa Katz
571-281-0220

Tom Threlkeld
202-547-7424

communications@allianceforcareathome.org

Alliance Member, Jonathan Fleece, Testifies Before Congress on the Value of Care at Home

Ways & Means Health Subcommittee Hearing on “After the Hospital: Ensuring Access to Quality Post-Acute Care”

(Washington, DC and Alexandria, VA) – The National Alliance for Care at Home (the Alliance) released the following statement at the conclusion of a hearing conducted by the House Ways & Means Subcommittee on Health on After the Hospital: Ensuring Access to Quality Post-Acute Care:

“The Alliance thanks Chairman Vern Buchanan (R-FL), Ranking Member Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), and all members of the Health Subcommittee for convening this important discussion on post-acute care. This hearing provided an opportunity to amplify the voices of home health and hospice providers and reinforce the essential role they play in delivering high-quality, patient-centered care in the setting people prefer—at home.”

Dr. Steve Landers

CEO, The Alliance

Alliance Member Testifies: Thank you, Jonathan Fleece

“We are especially grateful to Jonathan Fleece, CEO of Empath Health, for sharing his expertise and for his service on behalf of patients and families. Empath Health has long been a leader in setting the standard for high-quality, patient-centered care, and we appreciate its commitment to advancing care at home.

“As our nation’s population rapidly ages, it is more critical than ever to get these policies right and ensure that home health and hospice remain accessible and protected from harmful cuts and unnecessary administrative burdens. Not only is care at home beloved by patients and families, but it is also cost-efficient, easing strain on the healthcare system by reducing reliance on institutional care and allowing people to heal where they feel most comfortable.”

Jonathan Fleece The Alliance Testifies Before Congress

Continued Advocacy from The Alliance

“Coming out of this hearing, the Alliance remains committed to working with Congress and the Administration to strengthen home health and hospice, safeguard access to these essential services, and advance policies that support their long-term sustainability. We will continue advocating against payment cuts that threaten access, promoting value-based care models, and ensuring regulatory oversight enhances—rather than hinders—the ability of providers to deliver the best possible care.”

To read the full subcommittee hearing testimony of Jonathan Fleece, CEO of Empath Health, click here.

# # #

About the National Alliance for Care at Home

Reduce Insurance Claim Denials

by Rowan Report | Feb 20, 2025 | Admin, Regulatory

by Lynn Labarta, SimiTree

Reduce Insurance Claim Denials

2025 Guide for Home Health and Hospice Agencies

Is your home health or hospice agency struggling with insurance claim denials? You’re in good company. As we move into 2025, claim denials remain the #1 challenge affecting revenue cycles across the industry. But there’s hope – we’ve compiled the latest strategies and insights to help you overcome this persistent challenge.

The Current State of Home Health & Hospice Billing

The healthcare landscape continues to evolve, and with it, so do the complexities of billing and reimbursement. Home health and hospice agencies face unique challenges, from managing PDGM requirements on the home health side to navigating multiple payer systems on the hospice side. Recent data shows that denied claims significantly impact not just revenue but also patient care delivery and operational efficiency.

Understanding Home Health & Hospice-Specific Denial Triggers

Let’s examine the primary causes of claim denials in our sector:

Home Health Eligibility Challenges

Medicare homebound status verification issues
Face-to-face documentation gaps
PDGM period confusion
Medicare Advantage plan authorization complexities

Hospice-Specific Documentation Issues

Terminal illness certification problems
Level of care documentation gaps
Missing physician narratives
Notice of Election timing issues

Strategic Solutions to Reduce Insurance Claim Denials in 2025

Optimize Your Intake Process

Implement robust homebound status verification- Home health
Establish face-to-face documentation protocols
Create PDGM period tracking systems- Home health
Develop payer-specific authorization workflows

Leverage Technology Effectively

Use specialized home health & hospice billing software
Implement automated eligibility verification systems
Set up PDGM period alerts- Home health
Utilize NOE and NOA tracking tools

Build a Specialized Denial Management Approach

Create dedicated teams for Medicare vs. non-Medicare appeals
Develop PDGM-specific denial protocols- Home Health
Establish hospice-specific documentation review processes
Implement specialty-focused staff training programs

Pro Tips for Implementation

Focus on specialty-specific staff training in home health and hospice billing requirements
Create separate workflows for different payer types (Medicare, Medicare Advantage (home health), private insurance)
Implement weekly PDGM period reviews- Home Health
Establish clear communication channels between clinical and billing staff

Looking Ahead in 2025

The home health and hospice landscape continues to evolve, but with proper strategies in place, your agency can thrive. Focus on building robust processes that address the unique challenges of our industry while maintaining compliance and optimization.

Action Steps to Reduce Insurance Claim Denials for Your Agency

Evaluate your current denial rates by payer type
Assess your PDGM period management effectiveness- Home Health
Review your hospice documentation protocols
Implement targeted improvements based on your findings

Remember, reducing claim denials isn’t just about better processes – it’s about ensuring your agency’s financial health so you can continue providing essential care to your community.

# # #

Lynn Labarta reduce insurance claim denials

Lynn Labarta, VP of Post Acute RCM and the founder of Imark Billing (now SimiTree) has a wealth of experience in the healthcare industry. Lynn provides comprehensive billing services for home health and hospice agencies, streamlining their revenue cycle management process while supporting and managing billing challenges and compliance with evolving healthcare regulations and managing billing challenges; essentially acting as a key partner to ensure accurate and timely claim submissions and optimal revenue collection for agencies.

Is Medicaid Down for the Count?

by Kristin Rowan | Feb 6, 2025 | Breaking News, Regulatory

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Medicaid Payment System Goes Dark

On Monday, January 27, President Trump, through the Office of Management and Budget, announced a temporary freeze on federal spending while his newly designated head of the Department of Government Efficiency ensures all spending follows the executive orders the President has signed. The memo was vague and caused widespread confusion across government departments. Almost immediately after the memo was circulated, Medicaid programs could not access the Payment Management Services web portal, the entity responsible for paying Medicaid claims.

The Memo

The language used in the memo on federal spending was broad and overreaching. As such, many federal organizations were unclear as to whether the memo applied to them. The message in the memo was that the administration intended to curb any spending that does not improve the day-to-day lives of the people. Throughout the day Monday, the White House sent clarifications about what programs would not be impacted. Among them were food assistance programs like SNAP, WIC, and Meals on Wheels, and Medicaid. The medicaid payment portal went down, despite this clarification.

Exclusions

Multiple state and federal agencies reached out to the White House for clarification following the release of the memo. Explicitly excluded from the freeze are direct benefit plans like Social Security and Medicare. In addition to the programs named in the memo, clarification on additional programs that would not be impacted included Medicaid. Despite the temporary website outage, claims were still being processed and payments were still being made.

Immediate Lawsuits

Almost simultaneously with the distribution of the memo, several non-profit organizations filed suit against the federal government. They called Trump’s action an “unlawful and unconstitutional” act, even temporarily. The pause on federal spending was set to go into effect at 5 p.m. ET on Tuesday. Minutes before, U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan put a pause on the pause.

Temporary Freeze on the Temporary Freeze

To allow both sides time to construct an argument, the judge stayed the funding freeze until Monday, February 3. That morning, the judge will hear arguments and consider the issue. After the stay, attorneys general from 22 states and D.C. filed their own lawsuit to permanently block the freeze and prevent any future attempts to cut off already approved federal funding.

Then Comes the Thaw

If the judge allows the freeze to move forward, Trump has given every agency until February 10 to account for and explain all spending programs within their departments. Once the accounting has been reviewed, likely the OMB and the Department of Government Efficiency will determine which federal spending programs can resume operation.

There is no indication yet as to whether Trump will extend the February 10 deadline, given the delay in the courts. By the time the judge rules on Monday, however, we hope the White House will have issued additional details and guidance to avoid additional disruption to essential services like Medicare and Medicaid.

Final? Ruling

Early Monday, Judge AliKhan said she was not convinced by the argument that nonprofit groups have no case against the funding freeze since the OMB rescinded the memo. The administration argued that a brief pause on funding to align federal spending is within the law. The administration also suggests that the courts have no standing to block it. AliKhan has indicated that she will likely grant a longer temporary order to stay the funding freeze.

# # #

Kristin Rowan has been working at The Rowan Report since 2008. She is the owner and Editor-in-chief of The Rowan Report, the industry’s most trusted source for care at home news .She also has a master’s degree in business administration and marketing and runs Girard Marketing Group, a multi-faceted boutique marketing firm specializing in content creation, social media management, and event marketing. Connect with Kristin directly kristin@girardmarketinggroup.com or www.girardmarketinggroup.com

Congress Allows Medicare Advantage to Deny Coverage

by Kristin Rowan | Jan 9, 2025 | Advocacy, Editorial, Medicare Advantage, Regulatory

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Medicare Advantage Bill Dies in Congress

The 118th United States Congress, ran from January 3, 2023 to January 3, 2025. This Congress’s first law was passed on March 20, 2023, much later than most previous congressional sessions. In its first year, it passed only 34 bills. In the two years of this congressional run, the 118th passed 209 public laws, almost half the average since 1989. Among the many bills that died on the floor before time ran out was the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act (H.R. 8702/S. 4532). Senate and House members introduced the bill on June 12, 2024.

Improving Seniors' Timely Access to Care

In June of 2024, senators and representatives introduced bipartisan legislation that would have curbed Medicare Advantage’s ability to deny claims. The bill included language that allowed CMS the authority to establish standard timeframes for electronic prior authorizations requests including expedited requests and real-time decisions for routinely approved services. The bill also included requirements for transparency and reporting, including:

- establishing an electronic prior authorization process
- establishing a process for real-time decisions for routine services
- providing more detailed reports on use of prior authorization including
  - rates of approvals
  - denials
  - average time for approvals
- pressing Medicare Advantage providers to incorporate input from health care providers on their authorization processes and decisions
- adopting prior authorization programs that adhere to evidence-based medical guidelines
- requiring Medicare Advantage providers to report on the percentage of denied claims that were later overturned

Overwhelming Support

At the time this bill was reintroduced to Congress in June, 135 House co-sponsors and 44 Senate co-sponsors signed on. By the end of July, the bill had been read, sent to the House Ways and Means Committee, and passed. Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) noted that more than 500 organizations had endorsed the act.

Urgent Need for Change

In early 2024, an audit from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed that Medicare Advantage plans eventually approve 75% of authorization requests for services that were initally denied. More recently, HHS OIG released a report showing that MA plans incorrectly denied services to beneficiaries even though they met the requirements for coverage. Following the report, HHS OIG made the following recommendations to CMS:

- issue new guidance on the use of MAO clinical criteria in medical necessity reviews
- update audit protocols for Medicare Advantage to address the issues of MAO use of clinical critera and examining service types
- direct MAOs to indentify and address the causes for manual review errors and system errors.

CMS agreed with all three recommendations.

Dead in the Field

Despite the bipartisan, bicameral support of this much needed overhaul of Medicare Advantage providers, the bill is currently in pile of unaddressed issues that the 118th Congress just didn’t get to. Despite having it in front of them for five months, and despite passing nearly half the legislation of the 17 most recent congressional sessions, the bill that would keep MA beneficiaries from waiting inordinate amounts of time for routine care will have to wait for the next session to resume. Let’s hope the 119th Congress is more productive.

# # #

Good News for Veterans and Care at Home

by Kristin Rowan | Jan 9, 2025 | Advocacy, Hospice, Regulatory

by Kristin Rowan, Editor

Biden's Final Acts

With only a short number of days left in office, President Joe Biden has been making headlines. Not all of his final decisions have been met with absolute approval, but his latest one will make a difference for our veterans wanting Care at Home. On Thursday, January 3, 2025, President Biden signed into law the Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act.

The Dole Act

The Elizabeth Dole Act improves upon much of the benefits, programs, and services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Some of these changes include providing protections for care agreements between veterans and clinicians, modifications to educational assistance programs and benefits, expansion of the Native American Direct Loan program, increases per diem rates for veteran transitional housing, and various administrative and oversight tasks.

Elizabeth Dole Home Care Act

The Elizabeth Dole Home Care Act is a bill within the larger act specific to home- and community-based services (HCBS). The home care act aims to enhance veterans’ access to the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) nationwide. The new law also allows the VA to increase funding for HCBS. Prior to this, the VA was able to allocate 65% of nursing home care to home care services.

Additionally, the home care bill will provide support and benefits to caregivers of some disabled veterans, start a pilot to provide non-medical supportive care at home to veterans with limited access to home health aides, and increase access to HCBS for Native American Veterans.

The Industry Responds

The National Alliance for Care at Home responded to the landmark legislation, specifically siting section 301 of the bill, known as Gerald’s Law. Gerald’s is so named for a Michigan veteran who was denied his non-service related burial and plot benefit after he died at home while under VA hospice care. Gerald’s Law requires the VA to provide a burial and funeral allowance for veterans who were receiving VA hospice care in a home or other setting outside a hospital or nursing home.

“We are deeply grateful for the bipartisan support of Gerald’s Law and its inclusion in the Dole Act. This legislation ensures that Veterans and their families can choose hospice care in the setting that best meets their needs without risking the loss of crucial burial benefits. We thank Senators Moran, Tester, and Hassan, Representatives Ciscomani, Bost, Brownley, and Takano, and many others for their leadership, as well as President Biden for signing this important bill into law.”

Dr. Steve Landers

CEO, The Alliance

HCAOA, Leading Age, National PACE Association (NPA), and many others joined the Alliance in applauding Biden for signing the bill into law. They noted that providing care at home and in the community improves the quality of life for veterans and their caregivers. HCBS also come at a much lower cost than hospital and institutional care.

HCAOA said in a statement that the bill is “…a crucial victory for both veterans and their caregivers.” The President and CEO of NPA said the bill would dramatically increase options for veterans who want to age in place and that Congress can “…easily implement PACE for hundreds of thousands of additional seniors and their families.”

The VA has found that HCBS can delay or remove the need for nursing home or assisted living admission. Care at Home also reduces the risk of preventable rehospitalizations.

Final Thoughts

Once again, it seems the world is “discovering” that which we have known for ages: Home based care is better, cheaper, and more effective than institutional care. In the last few years, doctors and hospitals have figured this out and implemented hospital at home care. Now, the VA has finally figured it out as well. When this law takes effect, we as an industry will breathe a collective sigh when our veterans see better outcomes, their caregivers are better supported, the cost for their care decreases, and especially when our veterans enjoy a better quality of life in their final days without sacrificing the benefits to which they are so richly entitled.

One small step for veterans, one giant leap for Care at Home.

# # #

« Older Entries

Next Entries »